GNSS World of China

Volume 48 Issue 5
Oct.  2023
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
DONG Haoshen, ZHANG Qiyuan. Performance analysis of GPS/Galileo/BDS three systems and all-frequency PPP-AR[J]. GNSS World of China, 2023, 48(5): 38-45, 70. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023161
Citation: DONG Haoshen, ZHANG Qiyuan. Performance analysis of GPS/Galileo/BDS three systems and all-frequency PPP-AR[J]. GNSS World of China, 2023, 48(5): 38-45, 70. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023161

Performance analysis of GPS/Galileo/BDS three systems and all-frequency PPP-AR

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2023161
  • Received Date: 2023-08-02
  • Accepted Date: 2023-08-02
  • Available Online: 2023-10-23
  • The accurate estimation of phase biases is an essential prerequisite for achieving precise point positioning ambiguity resolution (PPP-AR). However, the phase bias products provided by the current International GNSS Service (IGS) analysis centers (ACs) are limited in terms of frequency combinations, which restricts PPP-AR users to using observations from corresponding frequencies only. This results in the underutilization of multi-frequency GNSS observations. In order to realize flexible PPP-AR based on arbitrary GNSS frequency selection and observation combinations (referred to as all-frequency PPP-AR), we conducted an analysis using static observation data from over 100 globally distributed IGS stations for a week. We estimated the observable phase biases (OSBs) for all available frequencies and conducted static precise point positioning experiments using the open-source PRIDE PPP-AR software. The results indicate that the average standard deviations of pseudo-range and phase OSB products are 0.25 ns and 0.34 ns, respectively, satisfying the requirements for PPP ambiguity fixing. The average ambiguity fixing rates for Galileo and BDS-3 frequency combinations are 98.25% and 96.74%, and 90.31% and 91.64%, respectively. For BDS-2, the average ambiguity fixing rates are 81.27% and 86.02%. Compared to the reference frequencies, the positioning accuracy decreases by nearly 15% in all three directions for E1/E6 and G1/G5 combinations. The C2/C5 combination performs well in the east (E) and north (N) directions but exhibits a 22.8% decrease in accuracy in the up (U) direction. In the testing of the GPS, Galileo, and BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), the remaining frequency combinations, including C2/C7, C1/C5, C1/C6, C1/C7, E1/E7, and E1/E8, all exhibited stable positioning accuracy. The positioning accuracy of each frequency combination varied by 5% in the E, 5% in the N, and 15% in the U direction, with no significant deviation compared to the reference frequency. Therefore, full-frequency PPP-AR has achieved a considerable degree of reliability. Full-frequency PPP-AR takes full advantage of the multi-frequency GNSS observations, offering higher practical value compared to using observations from the base frequency alone. Furthermore, full-frequency PPP-AR allows users to select and combine GNSS frequencies according to their specific requirements, thereby better satisfying the needs of various applications.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    ZUMBERGE J F, HEFLIN M B, JEFFERSON D C, et al. Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks[J]. Journal of geophysical research, 1997, 102(B3): 5005-5017. DOI: 10.1029/96jb03860
    [2]
    张小红, 李星星, 李盼. GNSS精密单点定位技术及应用进展[J]. 测绘学报, 2017, 46(10): 1399-1407. DOI: 10.11947/j.AGCS.2017.20170327
    [3]
    GE M R, GENDT G, ROTHACHER M, et al. Resolution of GPS carrier-phase ambiguities in precise point positioning (PPP) with daily observations[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2008, 82(7): 389-399. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-007-0187-4
    [4]
    BANVILLE S, GENG J H, LOYER S, et al. On the interoperability of IGS products for precise point positioning with ambiguity resolution[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2020, 94(1): 10. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-019-01335-w
    [5]
    GENG J, CHEN X Y, PAN Y X, et al. A modified phase clock/bias model to improve PPP ambiguity resolution at Wuhan University[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2019(2): 1-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-019-01301-6
    [6]
    LAURICHESSE D. Carrier-phase ambiguity resolution[J]. GPS world, 2015.
    [7]
    VILLIGER A , SCHAER S , DACH R , et al. Determination of GNSS pseudo-absolute code biases and their long-term combination[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2019, 93(9): 1487-1500. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-019-01262-w
    [8]
    LIU G, GUO F, WANG J, et al. Triple-frequency GPS un-differenced and uncombined PPP ambiguity resolution using observable-specific satellite signal biases[J]. Remote sensing, 2020, 12(14): 2310. DOI: 10.3390/rs12142310
    [9]
    SCHAER S, VILLIGER A, ARNOLD D, et al. The CODE ambiguity-fixed clock and phase bias analysis products: generation, properties, and performance[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2021, 95(7): 81. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-021-01521-9
    [10]
    GENG J H, WEN Q , ZHANG Q Y, et al. GNSS observable-specific phase biases for all-frequency PPP ambiguity resolution[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2022, 96(2): 11. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-022-01602-3
    [11]
    WANG Z Y, WANG R G, WANG Y Y, et al. Modelling and assessment of a new triple-frequency IF1213 PPP with BDS/GPS[J]. Remote sensing, 2022, 14(18) : 4509-4509. DOI: 10.3390/rs14184509
    [12]
    ODIJK D, ZHANG B C, KHODABANDEH A, et al. On the estimability of parameters in undifferenced, uncombined GNSS network and PPP-RTK user models by means of S-system theory[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2016, 90(1): 15-44. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-015-0854-9
    [13]
    DONG D N, BOCK Y. Global Positioning System network analysis with phase ambiguity resolution applied to crustal deformation studies in California[J]. Journal of geophysical research solid earth, 1989, 94(B4): 3949-3966. DOI: 10.1029/JB094IB04P03949
    [14]
    GENG J, ZHANG Q Y, LI G C, et al. Observable-specific phase biases of Wuhan multi-GNSS experiment analysis center’s rapid satellite products[J]. Satellite navigation, 2022, 3(1): 1-15 . DOI: 10.1186/s43020-022-00084-0
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(11)  / Tables(1)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (210) PDF downloads(26) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return