GNSS World of China

Volume 46 Issue 3
Jun.  2021
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
YIN Haibo, GUO Hang, LUO Xiaowen. Performance analysis of BDS/GNSS precision point positioning[J]. GNSS World of China, 2021, 46(3): 66-71. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2020121501
Citation: YIN Haibo, GUO Hang, LUO Xiaowen. Performance analysis of BDS/GNSS precision point positioning[J]. GNSS World of China, 2021, 46(3): 66-71. doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2020121501

Performance analysis of BDS/GNSS precision point positioning

doi: 10.12265/j.gnss.2020121501
  • Received Date: 2020-12-15
    Available Online: 2021-07-05
  • Publish Date: 2021-06-30
  • With the success of the global networking of the BeiDou Navigation Satellite System (BDS), the application research based on the BDS is in full swing, especially the multi-frequency and multi-mode fusion positioning including BDS is becoming the focus of research. This article uses BDS (BDS-3), GPS, GLONASS, and Galileo observation data from multiple stations in the MGEX (Multi-GNSS Experiment), based on RTKLIB open source code, and performs the precision point positioning experiment of the three combined systems BDS/GPS, BDS/GLONASS, and BDS/Galileo on the Visual Studio 2017 platform. The positioning performance of the three combined systems is compared and analyzed from static PPP, dynamic PPP, number of visible satellites, and attenuation of precision (DOP). The experimental results show that the BDS/GPS combined system has the largest number of visible satellites and the smallest DOP value. The accuracy of the three directions after static PPP convergence is better than 6 cm. Whether it is static or dynamic, its positioning performance is the best. The dynamic precise point positioning (PPP) positioning jitter of the BDS/GLONASS and BDS/Galileo combined system is relatively large. It can be seen that the number of satellites is smaller than the BDS/GPS combined system, and the convergence time is longer. The dynamic PPP positioning performance of the two is also worse than that of the BDS/GPS combined system.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    杜祯强, 柴洪洲, 向民志, 等. 3种PPP模型的统一模糊度固定方法[J]. 测绘学报, 2020, 49(7): 824-832.
    [2]
    吕伟才, 高井祥. GPS/Galileo系统间偏差的随机模型对三频动态PPP的影响[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(6): 1383-1390.
    [3]
    屈利忠, 赵齐乐, 郭靖, 等. GNSS融合动态精密单点定位性能分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2016, 36(4): 298-302.
    [4]
    魏二虎, 刘学习, 王凌轩, 等. BDS/GPS组合精密单点定位精度分析与评价[J]. 武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2018, 43(11): 1654-1660.
    [5]
    王瑞, 柴洪洲, 刘增, 等. GPS/GLONASS组合实时动态精密单点定位[J]. 海洋测绘, 2019, 39(1): 14-18. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-3044.2019.01.004
    [6]
    任晓东, 张柯柯, 李星星, 等. BeiDou、Galileo、GLONASS、GPS多系统融合精密单点[J]. 测绘学报, 2015, 44(12): 1307-1313, 1339.
    [7]
    李杰, 郑作亚, 张大众, 等. Android移动终端单频BDS/GPS实时PPP技术研究[J]. 测绘科学, 2019, 44(3): 149-153.
    [8]
    LI X X, LI X, YUAN Y Q, et al. Multi-GNSS phase delay estimation and PPP ambiguity resolution: GPS, BDS, GLONASS, Galileo[J]. Journal of geodesy, 2018, 92(6): 579-608. DOI: 10.1007/s00190-017-1081-3
    [9]
    刘学习. BDS/GPS组合精密单点定位及其模糊度固定技术与方法研究[D]. 武汉: 武汉大学, 2018.
    [10]
    GENG T, ZHANG P, WANG W, et al. Comparison of ultra-rapid orbit prediction strategies for GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou[J]. Sensors, 2018, 18(2): 477. DOI: 10.3390/s18020477
    [11]
    董永祥. 多系统GNSS组合动态精密单点定位算法研究[D]. 淮南: 安徽理工大学, 2019.
    [12]
    苗维凯, 陈旭升, 刘洋洋. GNSS多系统组合PPP解算方法与成果分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学, 2019, 39(5): 521-527.
    [13]
    杨晓伟. GNSS精密单点定位算法研究与精度分析[D]. 徐州: 中国矿业大学, 2019.
    [14]
    LI X X, ZHANG X H, REN X D, et al. Precise positioning with current multi-constellation Global Navigation Satellite Systems: GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou[J]. Scientific reports, 2015, 5(1): 8328. DOI: 10.1038/srep08328
    [15]
    TEGEDOR J, OVSTEDAL O, VIGEN E. Precise orbit determination and point positioning using GPS, GLONASS, Galileo and BeiDou[J]. Journal of geodetic science, 2014, 4(1): 65-73. DOI: 10.2478/jogs-2014-0008
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(4)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (429) PDF downloads(50) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return